From:
hionsolar@aol.com (Hion solar)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.plasma
References:
<8847vg$ho0$1@jupiter.cs.uml.edu>
Organization: AOL
http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: Plasma Quench Technology
Hoping,
Your
detailed response intrigues me. We have
been using the expansion of a jet
of hot gases [H + O + H2O + OH + O2+ H2
+ some ionized species] to quench
recombination. Ahead of the nozzle, upstream, there is concentrated
sunlight
and water vapor [2-100 Torr] subjected to a glow discharge.
Downstream, after
quenching, a skimmer is used to affect some separation
into lighter and heavier
fractions.
The object is to produce H2 and O2 from water.
We have looked
at the emission spectrum of the water vapor glow discharge
without
sunlight and see many UV lines. I'm wondering how you determined that
the
fast recombination of the ions to form the neutrals or molecules produced
"non-equilibrium
densities in the excited electronic states" ? What kind of
instrumentation?
I've never seen a
deep blue hydrogen jet.......yet. It
sounds like a beautiful
sight! How
much energy were you dissipating in the Pashen arc-jet? Was it
exhausting to atmosphere with
pressure ratio > choked flow at inlet? Just H2
gas feed?
If
the electrons were still heating up the gas molecules as they exited the
jet
and went through the transition region and dropped to sub-sonic
velocity, maybe
a possitive-grid in the flow field could have stopped the
downstream heating
affect [to rule that out]?
Maybe you would
be kind enough to comment on our work that has been published
in 1996 in
IECEC. You can see the paper on our
web-site: WWW.HIONSOLAR.COM
It
is called Solar Thermal Hydrogen Production Paper on bottom of Home Page.
I
am particularly interested in your comments about the H(-) ion and postulated
chain
reactions using this ion to dissociate water in the excited state by
electron
donation. We would like to have a way
to "see" this ion in the
reaction flow-field and in the
"afterglow" region where the separation occurs.
Thanks and
Regards....Walt Pyle
>Subject: Re: Plasma Quench Technology
>From:
"hoping" Hoffmann.Win@t-online.de
>Date: 02/12/2000 10:15 AM
Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id:
<8847vg$ho0$1@jupiter.cs.uml.edu>
>
>
>Hi
Walt:
>
>I did this work VERY long ago and to my knowledge nobody
has resumed since
>then. The idea was to use an effect in analogy to
the gasdynamic CO2 laser
>principle, which was quite new in those days.
(Now you have an impression
>how long ago this was!) We (me and my
collegues) knew, that very rapid
>cooling of a quasi fully ionised
plasma in equilibrium leads to
>non-equilibrium densities in the
excited electronic states of the neutral
>atom or molecule, because of
the fast recombination of the ion. If
>collisional and radiation
processes are within certain ranges, even
>population inversion should
occur. In some cases very high laser power at
>comparably short
wavelenghts should be possible. This was a result of the
>theory. In
the beginning it was calculated for hydrogen because it's the
>simplest
system and the rate coefficients were reatively well known - in
>contrast
to other gases. Although I knew that the H term scheme was not
>necessarily
the optimum I spent about two years to try making a high power
>CW!
hydrogen laser in the near infrared (Paschen). Have you ever seen a deep
>blue
hydrogen jet? It's a beautiful sight. It was created by supersonic
>expansion
of an arc discharge in a device originally destined for electric
>propulsion
in space. It finally turned out, that at electron densities, high
>enough
to produce a substantial optical gain in the direction perpendicular
>to
the jet, in contrast to the (simple) theory the cooling was not rapid
>enough
to produce population inversion at all. Or in other words: The blue
>jet
with population inversion was too thin. Or the device was too small
>respectively. I am quite shure that in the atmospheres of
some stars there
>may exist sometimes the conditions for a natural
laser with only one pass.
>The reason for the failure? I still know it
not for shure, because my
>interest turned to other more short therm
promising laser research subjects,
>but I think that from the point of
view of an electron with high (runaway)
>speed, the gas velocity was
deep in the subsonic region, so that high energy
>electrons could still
heat up the plasma all the way down the jet.
>Furthermore all the zoo
of plasma waves could have had heating capability.
>The only way to
simply overcome this problem was to leave the idea to
>separating
plasma production and decay by some distance in space, but to do
>just
the same thing in time, that means to look in the afterglow of a
>decaying
pulsed plasma. That's what a lot of people did later with
>remarkable
results. One of the first was Silvfast at the Bell Labs, and a
>lot of
work was also done in Russia. Later then the principle was extended
>successfully
to higher ionised species to obtain UV, XUV and so on.... But I
>am
still hoping (sic!) that someone will construct the CW plasmadynamic
>hydrogen
laser. Perhaps you?
>
>Regards Hoping
>