From:
star1ship@aol.com (STAR1SHIP)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.plasma
References:
<al7h66$2v7i$1@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
Organization: AOL
http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: New Scientist article: Anti-gravity
research on the rise
>Subject: Re: New Scientist article:
Anti-gravity research on the rise
>From: Charles Cagle
prophet@singtech.com
>The same physics that allows the formation
of nuclei with multiple
>protons is the same physics from which the
gravitational anisotropy of
>stars emerges. It is the same physics which correctly demotes
>Coulomb's
law to the status of a 'special case'.
Unfortunately for the
>mainstream run of the mill modern
so-called physicist it has the
>advantage of being true while
eliminating both GR and the 'strong
>force' and all the accouterments
of the 'standard model' like quarks,
>color, charm, gluons,
strangeness, etc. which have arisen out of the
>inventive minds of
pathological liars.
>
>CC.
I think I might agree
with you. The notion that protons are together in a
nucleas atom model
does violate universal law of like charges so the theory can
be discarded
failing on it's own merits and is not consistant with what is
known.
Attempts to patch the theory by
conjuring
up a weak or strong nuclear glue (gluons in partical theory) of vague
strong or weak force character does ring of hocus
pocus without the ring of
truth.
Seems Neils Bohr should have
taken Einstein's recommendation to go back to
Rutherford's gold foil
experiment and th basic research and create an dynamic
atom model to
account for the scattereing effect consistant with known law
elimintaing
the proton neutron nucleas.
Of course Bohr refused for ego reasons
to abandon his theory and today it
remains unfinished, inviolation of law and incompete lacking a
gravitational
component so many people are just stuck with the popular bad
theory lacking a
better atom model theory.
It is universal law
to the best of my knoledge all mass is in motion any where
at any time
anywhere in the
universe so that would include inside any real world atom
of credible atom
model so all mass motion as has been observed
is
taught as Universal Law for hundreds of years. A theory contridicting it
must
be proven.
For a good refererence and well documented on line book
complete with book
reviews and bibliography see
The Case Against the
Nuclear Atom
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/cana/review.htm
>From
jiggly spec atom model theory also observed in many later experiments of
atom
motion
"Everything is made up of tiny jiggly specs"(1) These are
called molecules.
Molecules are
are made from individual atoms considered basic elements like
gold and
radium and iron.(1)
(1)Mae and Doctor Ira Freeman, The Story of the
Atom (c)1960. Illustration
(jiggly
specks) above by Rene Martin. Ira was a Professor of physics Rudgers
University.
Mae is the author of a biography of Albert Einstein for boys and
girls.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The
contents of this message have been scanned for viruses by
the Clearswift
ES Policy Server, and no viruses were found.