From: Mike Rosing <rosing@neurophys.wisc.edu>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.plasma
Subject: Re: NEW CONSIDERATIONS OF MAGNETIC FIELD
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison
References: <au4oq1$b4lc$1@saturn.cs.uml.edu>


Mailnsuch wrote:
> Please visit the following website for detailed description of a current
> controversy in physics:
> http://www.geocities.com/bibhasde

Which says on some other page:

:The idea rested on two crucial theoretical assumptions:
:
:(1). The Poynting Vector represents a real power flow even when the
:electric field E and the magnetic field H are from different sources.
:
:(2). One could device a geometric configuration of fields such that a
:certain space integral becomes nonzero.

Step 1 is just a bit too far out dude. Rather than have me try to
explain why, I suggest you read this:
ttp://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/D.Jefferies/poynting.html

There's no math, so you should be able to follow it. The Poynting
vector is derived after the wave equation, you can't just pull it
out and use it where ever you like.

All your rejection letters seem extremely polite. I guess the journals
get a lot of stuff like yours :-)

Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike

--
Mike Rosing
www.beastrider.com BeastRider, LLC
SHARC debug tools